From scenario to simulated verdict.
SimuFi turns a crypto “what if?” into a structured debate between different market perspectives, grounded in the market context available at the time of the run.
You enter a hypothetical crypto or onchain event.
SimuFi gathers the available live market context for the asset.
Eight specialized perspectives form independent positions.
Agents challenge one another across three rounds.
The final positions are synthesized into a scenario assessment.
Why multiple agents?
Crypto markets are driven by different incentives. A trader may prioritize momentum, a whale may focus on liquidity and execution, a researcher may challenge the underlying thesis, while a developer may focus on protocol mechanics. SimuFi uses those differences to create disagreement that can expose assumptions you might otherwise miss.
Why the debate takes time
The interface intentionally stages the process so the simulation feels like a real analytical workflow: market context, agent initialization, opening positions, challenges, revisions, and synthesis.
What the result is — and isn't
The result is a structured simulation of possible market reactions. It is not a prediction engine, a guarantee, or a substitute for independent research. The strongest use is to pressure-test a thesis and understand the arguments on both sides.